Thursday, June 4, 2009

President Obama's Cairo Speech; A New Window to US- Middle East Relations


Today in the main auditorium of Cairo University in Cairo, Egypt, President Barack Obama gave what I found to be on the most memorable speeches of my lifetime. The reason why I found this speech to be more honorable than any other of the countless word-perfect speeches given by our most articulate President in recent history is how much purpose this speech served. We all know how rocky the ties between the US and the Middle Easy have been, and the Bush Presidency only made this worse. With the War in Iraq and 9/11 aggravating both sides of the equation, it was hard to see any healing coming from the severed ties. But today, President Obama extended an olive branch of peace and harmony to the Middle East that I never expected to see coming from any US Official in my lifetime.
Ever since his days on the campaign trail, Obama had preached of religious equality and fixing ties with the Arab World, but I had never really expected such a well coordinated effort so soon. The people of the Middle East have recently had low expectations from American leaders, and have all the right to do so after having dealt with our obviously dyslexic Ex-President Bush for 8 years. But today, when they were greeted by a very articulate and brilliant man who reflected his education and understanding of the Middle East and the Islamic religion, I am sure they were very impressed. 
President Obama started of his speech by respectfully saying "Asalam Alakum" (which means peace be upon you an Arabic, a common greeting). He then when on to admit how much mislabelling Muslims had to deal with, especially in the US, in the wake of 9/11. He put out a call for a new beginning, so that the Muslims shall not be persecuted in the US solely based on their religious principles and beliefs. He admitted that this much needed change will not come overnight, but yet was willing to put in as much work as he needs to to achieve this distant goal. He then goes on to say that this uneasiness and distrust between the Arab World and the US should have never happened in the first place, because the US was known for its ties with Middle Eastern countries centuries ago. He used the Treaty of Tripoli as an example, because that was the time that Morocco, Tripoli and Algiers had signed an peace agreement with US, and upheld it well as well. He then went on to show his support for the fight against the rise of a negative and "crude stereotype" for Muslims in the United States, and also went on to praise the 7 million Muslims living within the Us borders by revealing the little-known fact that they actually have an average income than the average American. He also appealed to the more traditional Muslims in the audience by pointing out the fact that the US Courts have ruled in the favor of Muslim girls being allowed to wear their Hijabs freely within the US. (I actually want to see what the Liberals in the US will say about this since they have always fought the acceptance of the Hijab in favor of women's rights). He then concludes his introduction by letting it be known that 'Islam is a part of America'.
He then started to be more specific and spoke of 7 important matters that I have discussed below;
1. Extremism: Continuing on with drawing a line between Muslims and terrorist, Obama went ton to speak about the US's ongoing fight with Extremist parties in the Middle East. He made his point clear by saying that "America has never been, and will never be, at war with Islam". I found this to be a very powerful sentence because this addresses the ongoing persecution and racial profiling that Muslims have faced within the US since 9/11 based purely on their religion.
He said that the US solely blames Al Qaeda for the attacks and will continue fighting them, with the aid of 46 countries in the coalition and the commitment will not weaken because not only have these extremists killed many Americans (civilians and troops) but Muslims worldwide as well. And he goes on to say that his fight against the extremists is not just through military excursions, but by working together with the governments harboring these terrorist, and goes on to explain how the US has invested $1.5 billion in aid Pakistan's build new schools and infrastructure, and $208 billion to help rebuild Afghanistan's economy. He concluded this part of his speech by admitting that Iraq was a war of choice (by a misinformed leader), but will not be an occupation. He said that he plans on rebuilding the Iraqi government and will withdraw all US Troops from Iraq by 2012 (the first clear outline given of the withdrawal of troops)

2. The second issue he discussed was the Israeli-Palestinian issue. Now this was a very touchy issue and I congratulate our President for being able to speak about both sides without showing any form of bias. He acknowledged Israeli-American ties, but announced that they don't have anything to do with the US's views on the matter. He admits that both Israeli's and Palestinians have suffered greatly and have lost a lot in the fight to gain a homeland. He then went on to support the Two-State Solution, which I personally believe is also the best method to resolve this conflict. He then wrapped this part of the speech up by proclaiming that he wants Jerusalem to be a place of peace, and to serve its role as the birthplace of the 3 major religions.

3. Nuclear Weapons. Even though he did not speak greatly on this matter, he did outline his intention for the world, which is a world with no nuclear weapons. Now do I believe this to be possible? No. I find it to be highly unlikely, but for the fate of mankind, I sure hope he succeeds.

4. The fourth matter he discussed was the the eternal pursuit of Democracy the US seems to have. We have seen the US get criticised time and time again for their views on foreign policy, and for their eagerness to 'stick their nose in others business', but he said that the only reason is the quest for international democracy. He said that the US aims to achieve freedom internationally and will continue to support a government of the people, by the people to set standards.

5. His fifth speaking point was about Religious freedom. When discussing this matter, Obama slightly criticised the Muslim world for their inability to accept other religions. He also spoke of the riff between Sunni's and Shiites within the Muslim community, and let his thought be clear on the matter, that the US was not happy about this. He went on to say that "Freedom of Religion is central for people living together".

6 & 7. The last two points that Obama spoke of was abouts women's rights and how denying a woman education is denying her equality. He pointed out that nations who have educated women, and more so, women elected into power are usually the most prosperous ones. He then connected his mention of prosperity to speak about development. He mentioned many aspects of development and the constant struggle between development and tradition. He advocated the growth of scientific research and pointed out many examples of how he is pushing for scientific innovation and the technological growth within the US.

Overall, I thought this speech was brilliant and will surely be a stepping stone to strengthening US- Middle East ties.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Homegrown Terrorists?


In case you have missed the headlines, the Tri-state area is buzzing about the new case of 'homegrown terrorists' that have emerged from Newburgh, NY. Apparently, 4 African -American men with extensive prison records had hatched a plan to blow up a couple of Synagogues in the Bronx while simultaneously shooting down military jets at the nearby Stewart International Airport, a widely known military base.
The reason I am choosing to write about this case as my first post as I return from my hiatus is because I believe that it is a very controversial case. Why is it controversial? Well, the media will chose to spin this in whichever direction they please. If you turn on Fox News, they will make it seem as a large invasion of Homeland Security and that  the US is still under heavy risk of attack from our 'enemies'. And then if you turn on to any other left-leaning media source, they make it seem as if this was an inevitable terrorist attack, that only fell through because of the well coordinated efforts of the FBI, and the overall idiocy of the 'terrorists'.
Now, I may not be a very trusted news source, but since I can be classified as the independent media, I will try and call this case for exactly what it is.
Now lets go back and analyze this case. These four men have extensive prison records, and according to the NY Times, they also have mental issues. Here is an interesting quote I found about one of the suspected bombers;

"An assistant imam at the mosque, Hamin Rashada, said that another one of the four men, Mr. Payen, seemed disturbed. Mr. Payen often talked in circles, showed signs of paranoia and kept bottles of urine in a messy apartment." (NY Times)

So, we firstly see that these men are not really the most sane people on earth, but I guess we can also argue that terrorist are not really the most judicious people around. But what I found to be most interesting about this case was how foolish these "terrorists" really are. Apparently the reason they decided to hatch these half-baked plans is because they were unhappy about the large amount of Muslims (all four of the suspects converted to Islam while incarcerated) and by setting off these bombs at synagogues and by shooting down military aircrafts, they will prove a point. That's just plain foolish and I simply do not see the connection.
And therefore, these men started attending mosques in their area looking a way to commit Jihad against the US, and that is when they met an undercover FBI informant, posing as a connect to a Pakistan based terrorist group (the media is still unsure whether it is Al-Qaeda or not). This man therefore set these men up with the bombs and surface-to-air missiles they would need to carry out their attacks. But since these men were completely untrained the FBI informant tricked them by giving them fake bombs and fake weapons, and they were oblivious to this until they were caught.
So on the day they planned to carry out their attacks, the men went to 2 synagogues in the Bronx and planted the bombs and planned to drive down to Stewart Airbase and blow up the so called bombs from a cell phone activated detonator while shooting down military aircrafts, but they were apprehended by the FBI, and other Homeland Security services that had worked with the FBI, before they left the scene.
In conclusion, I fail to believe that this case should be sensationalized in the way it is being shown. These were just a group of mentally unstable ex-convicts who sought to carry out attacks against an undefined enemy. They were completely untrained, and therefore failed miserably. But I am glad to see that the FBI is staying on top of Homeland Security like this. They have really proven themselves as hardworking, and I do feel a bit more secure now. Therefore I salute the brave men and women that thwarted this half-baked scheme, and look forward to more of these heroic moments.
Additional info on this topic;
or